Tropophilia and reductionism on the role of figures in rhetoric

Authors

  • Juan Ignacio Blanco Ilari Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento Universidad Católica Argentina

Keywords:

Tropos, Reductionism, Figures, Rhetoric

Abstract

In this paper I propose to reinvindicate the role that figurative language plays in philosophical thought. For this I will review the way in which the history of rhetoric was relegating the lexis to mere ornamentation without speculative substance. The rhetoric understood as an analysis of poetic literary figures is accompanied by the underestimation of the figures. I would like, in this work, to reverse that look. For this I will take two authors that emphasize the relationship between tropes and thought. In the first place I will take the radical thesis of Nietzsche (the language is rhetorical, in the sense of figurative language) and then I will take Ricoeur's more nuanced thesis according to which the metaphor (as a synecdoche of rhetoric) has a revealing, unavoidable power and irreducible.

Author Biography

  • Juan Ignacio Blanco Ilari, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento Universidad Católica Argentina
    Investigador Docente de la Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento en el area de Etica y Filosofia Moderna. Docente de la Universidad Catolica Argentina en la materia Filosofia Contemporanea. Investigador Adjunto del CONICET, tema: Metafora y lenguaje conceptual.

References

Aristóteles. 2002. Retórica. Madrid. Alianza.

Barthes, Roland. 1993. La Aventura Semiológica. Barcelona: Paidós.

Black, Max. 1962. Models and Metaphors. New York: Cornell University Press.

Borges, Jorge Luis. 1996. La Rosa Profunda. Obras Completas III. Barcelona: Emecé.

De Man, Paul. 1979. Alegories of Reading, Yale University Press.

Genette, Gérard. 1989. Figuras III. Barcelona: Lumen.

Heidegger, Martin. 2009. Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Ijsseling, Samuel. 1976. Rhetoric and Philosophy in conflict, Netherlands: Nijhoff

Murphy, James (ed.). 1983. Sinopsis Histórica de la Retórica Clásica. Barcelona. Gredos.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1996. Sobre la verdad y la mentira en sentido extramoral. Madrid: Tecnos.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2000. Escritos sobre retórica. Madrid: Trotta.

Perelman, Chaïm. “Analogía y Metáfora en ciencia, poesía y filosofía”, Revista de Estudios Sociales N.44, Bogotá. (Diciembre de 2012).

Richards, Ivor Armstrong. 1965. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ricoeur, P. 1998. Teoría de la Interpretación. México: SXXI.

Ricoeur, Paul. “The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling. Critical Inquiry. Vol. 5, N.1. (Autumn 1978). Pp. 143 – 159. The University of Chicago Press.

Ricoeur, Paul. 1977. La Metáfora Viva. Buenos Aires: Megápolis.

Ricoeur, Paul. 1983. Del Existencialismo a la filosofía del lenguaje. Bs. As.: Docencia.

Spang, Kurt. 2009. Persuasión. Fundamentos de Retórica. Navarra: EUNSA.

Tácito, Cornelio. 1981. Diálogo sobre los oradores. Madrid: Gredos.

Walker, Jeffrey. 2000. Poetics and Rhetorics in Antiquity, New York: Oxford University Press.

Worthington, Ian. (ed.). A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. U.K: Blakwell.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-09

How to Cite

Tropophilia and reductionism on the role of figures in rhetoric. (2020). Estudios De Filosofía Práctica E Historia De Las Ideas, 22, 1-26. http://qellqasqa.com.ar/ojs/index.php/estudios/article/view/344